After greeting a flock of major institutional investors into the Bitcoin (BTC) world in 2020, the cryptoverse is now questioning that the crypto market has also entered another administration level.
“Bitcoin’s parabolic rise is unsustainable in the near term. Vulnerable to a setback. The target technical upside of USD 35,000 has been exceeded. Time to take some money off the table,” Scott Minerd, Global Chief Investment Officer (CIO) at Guggenheim Partners, a significant global investment and advisory firm, twitted on Monday (UTC) when BTC was already trading below USD 35,000.
And it was sufficient to start the manipulation dispute.
Few were questioning how this statement followed a recent, very bullish one, with others saying that Minerd was trying to “hype pumping it up to 400k so he could dump on us early.”
The “400K” figure comes from Minerd’s December 16 interview with Bloomberg TV, saying that BTC’s fair value could still go higher. More precisely, “our fundamental work shows that bitcoin should be worth about [USD] 400,000,” based on the inadequacy and relative valuation, stated the CIO, without presenting a timeline when BTC might reach this level.
Also, as announced, in late November, Guggenheim filed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to reserve the right to invest as much as 10% of its USD 5.3bn Macro Opportunities Fund in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. This filing is estimated to become effective on January 31.
“Seems Minard wants to buy [USD] 500 million in bitcoin and as price runs higher he’s now telling people to take profits,” economist and trader Alex Krüger stated.
Others use these differing statements to claim that institutions are trying to get traders’ bitcoin at lower prices.
The speculation includes a well-known (in regulated markets illegal) maneuver executed in order books, whereby a whale, who has a bunch of BTC to offer for sale, certainly offers to sell a bunch, with many traders selling as soon as they see it, aiming to buy back later at the lower price once the whale’s BTC dump goes through. As these traders sell, the price goes down – and the whale pulls the order at the last moment, switches to buy, and makes a purchase of the now plenty available BTC at a lower price.
Furthermore, Bison Trails‘ Protocol Specialist, Elias Simos, tweeted that while little crypto ocean creatures were selling, whales were “gobbling up” their BTC.
In either case, the correction has been already expected, and US-based investment giant JPMorgan called this recent rally an unsustainable speculative mania while setting a long-term theoretical target of USD 146,000 per BTC.
Also, AMDAX Asset Management CIO Marcle Burger argued that “long term 35k is probably nothing, but given how fast we got to exceed 40k, a larger correction (30%ish) was to be expected.”
Other’s don’t seem particularly impressed by any of this, as they see nothing particularly new here, claiming that institutions are doing what they’ve always done, “call crazy targets” when they want to sell, say it’s overpriced when they want to buy – “first sell, then give out a byte that creates fud, and when the markets trend lower, buy again,” as a commenter twitted.
Also, as reported, as BTC becomes more integrated into institutional portfolios, it could become more correlated with other assets, and external events might have a growing impact on bitcoin.
In either case, crypto analytics firm Santiment noted that this is the most considerable one-day bitcoin correction since Black Thursday last March, saying that “those awaiting opportunities to buy projects at prices prior to this year’s surge got their wish.”
Meanwhile, crypto exchange OKEx CEO Jay Hao urged responsible trading during short-term volatile crypto markets. Simultaneously, Svenson argued that the worst part of the new money coming into crypto is that the volatility easily spooks these individuals.
In the past 24 hours, 245,092 trading positions worth USD 2.56bn were liquidated, according to bybt.com data. However, as crypto trader Loma reminded, “we haven’t had many consecutive red days across the board all year.”
Further comments about the subject:
No Comment