News & Updates

On The Hunt: A Digital Enterprise Sets A Bitcoin Bounty Against Vox

A Thousand BTC bounty to any individual who can get Recode’s Kara Swisher to remove an article on COVID-19.

Balaji Srinivasan has offered 1,000 in Bitcoin (BTC) bounty to a first Twitter user who can get Vox’s Recode technology news site to withdraw the story about Silicon Valley’s “exaggeration” to COVID-19 in February.

The former Coinbase technical director made an offer on Twitter today. He specifically targeted Kara Swisher, founder and editor in chief of Recode.

Srinivasan said he would give $ 1,000 – or 0.11 BTC at the time of writing – to anyone who was able to provide a printed “Recode” response who was willing to correct the work “and issue a correction. He stated on July 2, 2020:

Kara Swisher still hasn’t run a formal retraction for Recode’s dangerously false reporting on COVID-19. Since their business model does not incentivize truth, the public will have to do it.1000 BTC bounty for the first person who can get them to correct the record.

You can read the trend here:

According to Srinivasan, the article – with tweets affecting the transmission of the virus in the stool during the Chinese New Year celebrations – was a fake, clickbait and “wrong science”.

This story was published on February 13, and Srinivasan immediately appeared on Twitter to claim that the article “contained many accusations that were wrong or lacking in context to mislead readers,” including the risk of broadcasting viruses to low public institutions and the CDC did not recommend reducing the use of a handshake.

In the report, reporter Shirin Ghaffary explained the actions of a partner at Andreesen Horowitz who took preventative measures, e.g. B. Do not meet with anyone personally traveling to China and ordering a Hazmat suit and breathing apparatus for protection.

At the time of writing the song, there were less than twenty confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the US. it just happened. In China. That is an easier time.

Where did it start?

Recode requested an interview with Srinivasan, but instead responding, he re-share her message to 226,000 followers on Twitter on February 7, saying that he “happy to engage if he thought it was in good faith” but only to end not interested.

In the months after the exchange, Srinivasan continued his campaign against the media, jabbing journalists and calling them “sociopaths” and “shameful”. New York Times reporter Taylor Lorenz claims he is constantly harassed online and attacking his education, writing, careers “and worse”.

Bitcoin bounty reactions are mixed, and many are worried that the leading voice on Twitter will use terms like “reward” to describe actions against journalists.

“Do you encourage people to make threats or something like this?” Said user ItIsOurCorn. Others were more direct:

“What psychopath sits there and puts out a bounty for random strangers (potentially violent or mentally ill) to harass people? How do you consider yourself at all ethical?”

Some agree that while the original article has flaws, wealth is not the solution. “I agree that they must apologize and withdraw this article,” Crypto_JoeRogan said. “But that might not be the best way to resolve it.”

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply